The role of diseases, risk factors and symptoms in the definition of multimorbidity – a systematic review

dianagosalvez Diana Gosálvez Prados last modified 15/03/2016 12:18

The objective of this article is to explore how multimorbidity is defined in the scientific literature, with a focus on the roles of diseases, risk factors, and symptoms in the definitions.

Grauers Willadsen T, Bebe A, Køster-Rasmussen R, Ejg Jarbø D, Dorrit Guassora A, Boch Waldorff F, Reventlow S, de Fine Olivarius N. The role of diseases, risk factors and symptoms in the definition of multimorbidity – a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2016: 1-10. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/02813432.2016.1153242


Article

15/03/2016

Design:

Systematic review. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for relevant publications up until October 2013. One author extracted the information. Ambiguities were resolved, and consensus reached with one co-author.

Outcome measures were: cut-off point for the number of conditions included in the definitions of multimorbidity; setting; data sources; number, kind, duration, and severity of diagnoses, risk factors, and symptoms. We reviewed 163 articles. In 61 articles (37%), the cut-off point for multimorbidity was two or more conditions (diseases, risk factors, or symptoms). The most frequently used setting was the general population (68 articles, 42%), and primary care (41 articles, 25%). Sources of data were primarily self-reports (56 articles, 42%). Out of the 163 articles selected, 115 had individually constructed multimorbidity definitions, and in these articles diseases occurred in all definitions, with diabetes as the most frequent. Risk factors occurred in 98 (85%) and symptoms in 71 (62%) of the definitions. The severity of conditions was used in 26 (23%) of the definitions, but in different ways. The definition of multimorbidity is heterogeneous and risk factors are more often included than symptoms. The severity of conditions is seldom included. Since the number of people living with multimorbidity is increasing there is a need to develop a concept of multimorbidity that is more useful in daily clinical work.

Key points

  • The increasing number of multimorbidity patients challenges the healthcare system. The concept of multimorbidity needs further discussion in order to be implemented in daily clinical practice.

  • Many definitions of multimorbidity exist and most often a cut-off point of two or more is applied to a range of 4–147 different conditions.

  • Diseases are included in all definitions of multimorbidity.

  • Risk factors are often included in existing definitions, whereas symptoms and the severity of the conditions are less frequently included.


Grauers Willadsen T, Bebe A, Køster-Rasmussen R, Ejg Jarbø D, Dorrit Guassora A, Boch Waldorff F, Reventlow S, de Fine Olivarius N.

Resto de la Unión Europea