Comments of Prevention and health promotion
Primordial and Primary Prevention
- How could healthier communities be promoted, particularly in low to middleincome countries?
- What would motivate more countries, particularly the United States and Indonesia,to sign the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control?
- Is it possible to monitor, by country, research into tobacco control, surveys of smoking levels, global cigarette consumption, the economic effects on individual countries (tobacco leads to losses not gains as the costs of damage outweigh income from taxation), smoking costs to employers, the economic costs of fires and litter, costs to smokers, tobacco company documents, litigation, the tobacco industry and the recruitment of scientists to the tobacco company cause?
- What are the effects of MPOWER policies, particularly nicotine replacement therapy, on people living with multiple chronic diseases?
- What is the optimal diet and level of physical activity for people with multiple chronic conditions? How sustainable, cost-effective and safe are effective interventions?
- Which policies to improve diet and increase physical activity will be effective in patients with multiple chronic conditions?
- How might people in low and middle-income countries, who currently have healthy diets, be encouraged to keep to them rather than switch to unhealthier high fat, high salt, high calorie diets?
- How can we ensure that, with increasing urbanisation and urban poverty, the inhabitants of cities in low and middle-income countries are able to sustain levels of physical activity?
- How best to measure the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, particularly in places where laboratory tests are unavailable or unaffordable?
- Might age alone be used for risk assessment; if so, would the cut-off point be different in different countries?
- What is the right level of risk at which to begin pharmacological treatment?
- Will the polypill be more cost-effective than routine treatment in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention?
- What should the components of the polypill be?
- What is the best strategy for using the polypill in primary prevention: risk assessment followed by treatment or to offer the polypill to everyone above a certain age?
- If the polypill is cost-effective, how can its widespread use be encouraged?
- Might other polypills be useful in other forms of prevention, for example, smoking cessation or chronic lung disease?
Existing comments





Dificil contestar a todo esto, si sirve para reflexionar. Serían necesarias estrategias políticas muy ambiciosas. Hay muchos intereses económicos, la industria farmacéutica (la segunda en importancia tras la de armamentistica) necesita vender fármacos.
Creo que desde nuestro ámbito debemos aportar nuestro granito de arena y en la medida de lo posible exigir a nuestros representantes esfuerzos en este sentido (como por ejemplo la ley actual contra el tabaco o similares)





La estrategia de la polipíldora, para medicar a una población en riesgo. Veo más sensato reforzar las estrategias de intervención en facilitar el abandono tabáquico (políticas gubernamentales), implementación de modelos de educación para la salud, fomento de la alimentación saludable, incremeto de la actividad física, en todas las edades, desde el ámbito escolar, familiar, asociaciones, a nivel individual. (Desde Atención Primaria)
Por otro lado, unificar en una pastilla varios fármacos, cuando estos son necesarios, ¿disminuiría la interacción de los mismos?
No se creo que hay que salir del entorno de enfermedad y ocuparnos de como mantener a las personas sanas , por ello analizar factores protectores y analizar invertir en esos recursos sociales es prioritario